• News
  • Life
  • TV & Film
  • Beauty
  • Style
  • Home
  • News
    • Celebrity
    • Entertainment
    • Politics
    • Royal Family
  • Life
    • Animals
    • Food & Drink
    • Women's Health
    • Mental Health
    • Sex & Relationships
    • Travel
    • Real Life
  • TV & Film
    • True Crime
    • Documentaries
    • Netflix
    • BBC
    • ITV
    • Tyla Recommends
  • Beauty
    • Hair
    • Make-up
    • Skincare
  • Style
    • Home
    • Fashion
    • Shopping
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • UNILAD Tech
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
Threads
TikTok
Submit Your Content
Mum fined £69,000 after kids pick up 72 clams on beach which they mistakenly thought were seashells

Home> Life> Money

Published 15:33 24 May 2024 GMT+1

Mum fined £69,000 after kids pick up 72 clams on beach which they mistakenly thought were seashells

The California mother had no idea that her children had broken one of the state's most vital fishing laws

Rhianna Benson

Rhianna Benson

A US mother was left utterly blindsided earlier this year after being dealt a staggering £69,000 bill following a day at the beach with her family.

Apparently, California resident Charlotte Russ made the devastating mistake of neglecting to consider the America's strict rule on fishing licences before she allowed her young children to go on a scavenger hunt for shells - or, at least, what they thought were shells...

What Charlotte's brood had actually been collecting on the fun-fuelled day at the seaside, however, was a batch of 72 rather pricey clams - something the horrified mum was only made aware of after she was handed a hefty $88,000 fine.

Advert

The children had innocently scattered themselves across the sand on the hunt for the most eye-catching shells, later storing them in their mother's truck to be transported home to be transformed into decoration.

The family had no idea, however, that they'd actually broken state regulations by unknowingly collecting shellfish, as opposed to just shells.

As a result, Charlotte found herself in some very hot water indeed - pardon the ocean puns...

The woman was handed a hefty bill after her children collected some clams. (ABC7)
The woman was handed a hefty bill after her children collected some clams. (ABC7)

It turns out that the Russ family were in need of a fishing licence before they began inadvertently collecting the undergrown clams, which - it later transpired - were prohibited from collection even with the right paperwork.

Speaking on the matter on behalf of the Department of Fish and Wildlife, Lieutenant Matthew Gil later explained which rules exactly Charlotte had broken, revealing that the fact that the clams her children selected were not fully grown was the major issue.

"The reason we got it we have these regulations is because we have to let them get to 4 and a half inches," he told ABC7. "So they can have they can have offspring every year. They had juvenile clams."

Gil also went on to emphasise how exactly families - particularly children - can tell the difference between a clam and a shell, revealing that, if you cannot easily take a presumed shell apart, or split it, then it's very probably a clam.

Recalling the predicament she found herself in earlier this year, Charlotte said she was initially terrified.

Charlotte thankfully managed to escape with a $500 bill. (ABC7)
Charlotte thankfully managed to escape with a $500 bill. (ABC7)

"It made me really sad and depressed, and it kind of ruined our trip," she admitted, adding that she's certainly learned her lesson by now.

"They [kids] know now at the beach don't touch anything, but they know now what a clam is, compared to what a seashell is now, I've had to explain that to them."

Thankfully, the Russ family were let off with the colossal fine, having evidently had no idea she or her children had committed a fine.

She did, however, have to pay a one-off sum of $500 for the faff of the matter.

Featured Image Credit: ABC7

Topics: Crime, Money, Parenting, US News, News

Rhianna Benson
Rhianna Benson

Rhianna is an Entertainment Journalist at LADbible Group, working across LADbible, UNILAD and Tyla. She has a Masters in News Journalism from the University of Salford and a Masters in Ancient History from the University of Edinburgh. She previously worked as a Celebrity Reporter for OK! and New Magazines, and as a TV Writer for Reach PLC.

X

@rhiannaBjourno

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

4 hours ago
5 hours ago
9 hours ago
  • Getty Stock Image
    4 hours ago

    Everything weight loss jabs do to your body as fatal new side effects revealed

    The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has updated its guidance on GLP-1 receptor agonists

    Life
  • Getty Stock Images
    4 hours ago

    Your eyelashes falling out could be a sign of one of these three health conditions

    Experts at the Cleveland Clinic have explained what medical conditions are linked to the symptom

    Life
  • Getty Stock Images
    5 hours ago

    How long men 'last in the bedroom' on average according to their age

    Sometimes it's about the quality, not the quantity

    Life
  • McDonald's
    9 hours ago

    McDonald’s fans left 'devastated' over strict Friends ‘adult Happy Meal’ rule

    Everyone was asking the same question when it was announced, and McDonald's has provided a disappointing answer

    Life
  • Woman ends up in coma after thinking symptoms were caused by her 'noisy' kids
  • Rihanna praised for two-word response to troll who said they 'hate' her kids' names
  • 9-year-old girl dies after being left in extremely hot car for six hours while mum was at work
  • Tragic video mum shared online day before killing her husband with brain cancer