Featured Image Credit: Instagram/@radfordfamily
Topics: Radford Family, Sue Radford, Parenting, Money, Holiday, Travel, UK News
Rhianna Benson
Topics: Radford Family, Sue Radford, Parenting, Money, Holiday, Travel, UK News
Earlier this year, the parents of Britain's largest family flew 21 of their 22 children, as well as their 11 grandchildren, to Disney World in Florida for a sun-soaked vacation.
Within a matter of months, however, their lavish trip seemed to be somewhat overshadowed when Sue and Noel Radford - the mum and dad in question - were called to court.
Since then, questions have been raised by fellow parents with regards to which rules the Radfords had broken, as well as the punishments they could potentially face for doing so.
For those unfamiliar with Sue and Noel, the Lancashire couple first shot to stardom back in 2012, when Channel 4 featured them and their 13 children in a documentary about mass parenting in the UK.
Advert
Not only did the pair go on to welcome a further seven children of their own in the years that followed, but their eldest youngsters went on to birth a number of grandchildren.
Sue and Noel share 10 sons named Chris, 36, Jack, 28, Daniel, 26, Luke, 25, James, 21, Josh, 18, Max, 16, Oscar, 13, Casper, 13, and Archie, eight. The couple also had a stillborn son named Alfie in 2014.
In terms of their daughters, they share 11 in total - Sophie, 31, Chloe, 30, Millie, 24, Katie, 22, Ellie, 20, Aimee, 19, Tillie, 15, Hallie, 10, Phoebe, nine, Bonnie, six and Heidie, five.
Advert
As a result, the seemingly ever-growing brood went on to be cast in the much-loved Channel 5 reality TV series, 22 Kids and Counting.
Back in April, the couple flew all but one of their children (leaving daughter Chloe, who was due to give birth to her second child at the time, in the UK) to Florida for a trip purposed to celebrate Sue turning 50.
Advert
At the time, the family shared several snaps on Instagram, including one of the Radford children posing with Donald Duck and Minnie Mouse.
In total, it is understood that Sue and Noel forked out as much as £52,000 on the holiday, covering the cost of both flights and accommodation for each child.
The Radford family's transatlantic trip didn't go down too well with a number of onlookers, and several weeks ago, Sue and Noel were called to Preston Magistrates' Court.
Advert
There, the couple were found guilty of depriving four of their children receiving their vital education in favour of a cheaper vacation, by removing them from school during term time.
Their charge comes a year after the UK's Department for Education introduced new fines for mothers and fathers who allow their children to miss over 10 school sessions - or, five full days of school - per year for reasons that had not been authorised.
The regulation was put into place in August 2024 following record lows in exam results across the country, as well as record highs in absences.
Advert
Since then, local councils have had the power to issue fines for as much as £80 per absent child, which parents are requested to pay within 21 days of issuance. If this timeframe is ignored, the fee then rises again to a staggering £160.
This added amount will also be added in cases where a further fine is issued within three years of parents being handed the original.
While there may be some exceptional circumstances that allow a child to be removed from school following an official application to education leaders (as per Gov.uk), Sue and Noel Radford weren't found to have made such an appeal.
The government website clearly states: "A holiday is generally not considered an exceptional circumstance. You cannot usually take your child away during term time."
As such, for each of the four children that the couple flew to Florida during term time, they were forced to hand over £65. The Radfords were also forced to cough up an extra £118 in legal costs. This dragged their grand total to a £756 fine.
Though yet to be confirmed, Sue and Noel could have also been issued a series of accompanying punishments for their abuse of educational regulations.
One is a parenting order given by the court, which could see the couple having to attend parenting classes.
The second is an education supervision order, which can be issued by the court if a local council doesn't believe the Radfords are cooperating, and sees a supervisor appointed to the family to ensure the children are receiving regular education.
And lastly, Noel and Sue could also be issued a school attendance order, which will give them 15 days to provide evidence that the foursome have been registered at the school in question, or that they are being educated at home.
Failure to provide this could see the couple prosecuted or face a considerably larger fine.